Did You Get Married Shortly After Entering the United States? What You Need to Know About the New 90 Day Rule Before Filing For Your Green Card.


President Trump’s administration has recently changed a longstanding rule that has placed immigration lawyers on notice relating to a common occurrence in immigration law.  Many non-U.S. citizens enter the United States on Visitor Visas for many different reasons.  To visit family, to take a vacation, to see what the United States is like.  It is not uncommon for non-citizens find love and decide to get married to a U.S. citizen while in the U.S. on vacation.  While many may call this impetuous, it is not a situation that is confined to citizens and non-citizens.  The difficulty arises when you apply for a green card based on your marriage to a United States citizen when your marriage was within a short period of time after you entered the United States.  You could be denied a green card based on what is called “preconceived intent.”  So, how do you establish that you did not have preconceived intent to get married and stay in the United States when you entered on a temporary visa?  Well, the government has just made it a little harder with the implementation of the 90 day rule.  This rule replaces the old 30/60 day rule.


Temporary visas are just that.  Temporary.  In order to obtain a temporary visa, you must establish that you intend to depart the United States by the time your temporary visa expires.  For example, if you have a visitor visa that is good for six (6) months, when you enter the United States, you must have the intent to depart the United States within six (6) months.  If the government believes that you intended to stay in the United States longer than your temporary visa at the time you entered, this is called preconceived intent.  Prior to entering the United States, you conceived the intent to stay longer than authorized.  If you have preconceived intent, this is a violation of your status.  The key issue for a determination of preconceived intent lies in what your intent was at the time you were admitted into the United States.  It is not preconceived intent if you change your intent after you were admitted.  For example, if you truly entered the United States simply to visit and intended to leave within the six months allotted under your visitor visa, but you fell in love and only decided to stay after you were already admitted, then this would not be preconceived intent.  Regardless of your true intent, however, the problem arises when you apply to adjust your status and obtain a green card based on the marriage to a United States citizen that occurred within a short period of time after your admission to the United States.  Immigration officials will not simply take your word for it.  They will look to outside evidence to establish whether they make a finding that you had preconceived intent.  Let’s take a look at the old rule that USCIS (United States Customs and Immigration Services) used to follow.


The 30/60 day rule was a rule that consular officers would apply under the Foreign Affairs Manual when deciding on applications at the embassies throughout the world.  USCIS (United States Customs and Immigration Services) adopted this rule in practice and has applied it to domestic immigration applications and petitions, including applications for green cards.  It comes up most commonly when a United States citizen marries an alien who has been in the United States for a very short period of time.  When a person enters the United States on a non-immigrant visa (one that is only temporary, like a visitor visa, student visa, or temporary employment visa), and then seeks to change status within 30 days of their admission, they are presumed to have had a preconceived intent at the time of admission and therefore they have violated their status.

So, as a practical matter, an alien would enter the United States under a visitor visa.  That alien may have come and gone from the United States often under visitor visas.  Let’s say there is a young man from Honduras.  He may have spent a lot of time in the United States without thinking too much about the legality of each entry.  On the last entry, he may have decided to get married to a U.S. citizen and they both decide that they want to stay in the United States and build a life together.  They may have been dating for many years as he came and went on the visitor visa without any issue.  But, what that alien may not realize is that every time he enters the United States on a visitor visa, he must establish that he does not have preconceived intent.  Now, in reality, the CBP (Customs and Border Protection) agents may not even ask any question.  But, during any entry, if an agent determined that the alien has not established that he or she does not have a preconceived intent to stay past the authorized stay, that person can be denied admission.  So, after the last admission, no matter how many times he has come and gone on a visitor visa, he must establish he didn’t have preconceived intent when he applies to get his greencard based on his marriage to a U.S. citizen.

USCIS has developed a process of applying the 30/60 day rule.  If you were married within 30 days of your admission and then you apply for a green card, there is a presumption that you had preconceived intent.  If you were married between 30-60 days after your admission, there was a rebuttable presumption that you had preconceived intent.  This means that they used to presume that you intended to stay for good when you entered on the visitor visa, but you could try to change their mind with evidence that you actually intended to leave, but decided to stay after you entered.  After 60 days, there was no presumption of preconceived intent.


The Trump administration has done away with the 30/60 day rule and now applies a 90 day rule.  If you get married within 90 days of your admission into the United States, there is a presumption that you had preconceived intent.  In other words, it will be presumed that you intended to stay in the United States past your authorized stay on the temporary visa and it will be presumed that you formed the intent to stay before you entered the United States on that temporary visa.  This would be a violation of your status and could result in being placed in removal proceedings and/or denial of an immigration benefit.  Of course, the 90 day rule applies to more than people entering the United States on a visitor visa, getting married and then applying for a green card.  It applies to any temporary visa that requires that the alien cannot have preconceived intent.

Basically, the new 90 day rule is different from the 30/60 day rule in that it elongates the period of time where preconceived intent will be presumed, but makes the presumption rebuttable for the entire 90 day period.  Therefore, any alien who gets married to a United States citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident within 90 days of admission will be presumed to have intended to stay in the United States when the alien was admitted for a longer duration than was authorized.  This can lead to denial of a greencard, denial of change of status, and have other negative immigration consequences.


So, what would be considered evidence of preconceived intent and a violation of status?

  • engaging in unauthorized employment
  • enrolling in a course of unauthorized academic study
  • marrying a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident and taking up residence in the United States while in a nonimmigrant visa classification that prohibits immigrant intent
  • undertaking any other activity for which a change of status or adjustment of status would be required prior to obtaining such change or adjustment.


If you feel that you are in danger because you engaged in some act inconsistent with the temporary visa within 90 days of your admission, you should call an experienced immigration attorney right away.  Timing is very important in these cases.  An immigration attorney may be able to develop evidence to overcome the rebuttable presumption.  Immigration Attorneys offer consultations to discuss all of the important information relating to the 90 day rule.


Jeremy Lasnetski
Lasnetski Gihon Law

Jeremy Lasnetski is a partner at the Law Offices of Lasnetski Gihon Law.  The firm focuses on criminal defense, immigration and personal injury.  Mr. Lasnetski focuses his practice on criminal defense and immigration.  He is a Florida Bar Board Certified Criminal Trial Attorney and former Assistant State Attorney.  He has represented clients in criminal court on all types of charges, in both state and federal court.  He is also the former Jacksonville Regional Vice Chair of the American Immigration Lawyer’s Association, Central Florida Chapter and has represented clients in deportation proceedings, USCIS benefit cases, consular processing cases, and more.  He routinely gives presentations on criminal and immigration law issues to both criminal and immigration lawyers at conferences and seminars throughout the State of Florida.

Contact Information